![]()
THE OUTLOOK FOR THE S&P
(April, 1999)
"If an equity investment
does not have the potential
to have a return greater than a tax-free bond, there is
not much value."
Over the next 10 years we believe that the return on the S&P will be between 2% to 7%. Let's discuss a possible scenario for the S&P going forward from here that might explain why. Let's assume the in the next 10 years we will not have such a perfect world of high economic growth, high productivity, low inflation, low interest rates, and no major world conflicts, and that the three ratios we reviewed on pages 4 through 6, were just 35% lower, still far above their historical averages.
|
28
Year Historical Average
|
Projected
Ratios
|
|
| Price to Sales |
0.88
|
1.10
|
| Price to Cash Flow |
9.08
|
10.25
|
| Price to Earnings |
17.00
|
18.00
|
As you can see in the historical average chart, this would still suggest evaluations 15% above the historical average. Let's say that the S&P will sell at 18 times earnings instead of the current 30, 10.25 times cash flow instead of 15.75, and a price to sales ratio of 1.1 instead of 1.75.
By looking at the annual chart below, we can see that if the S&P grows at 7.5% (which is its 35 year average), it will grow from 900 in sales per share in 1999 to 1,726 in sales per share in the year 2008. If we assume a 1.25 times sales at that time (which is the highest price to sales ratio in 30 years, prior to today), the S&P will be selling at 2,157 in year 2008. This means that an increase from its current price of 1,561 to 2,157 in 10 years would generate a compound annual return of 3.29%.
If we assume 1.1 times sales, the 10 year return would be 1.97%
If we assume 0.95 times sales, the 10 year return would be 0.49%
If we assume 0.80 times sales, the 10 year return would be -1.22%
(The historical average
on this index has been 0.88 times sales.)
|
Obviously, if an investment does not have the potential to have a return greater than a tax-free bond, it would suggest that there is not much value. For those people who feel that indexing is an easy way to get a 15% to 20% return over |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A modern day example that shows this is possible is Japan's major index, the Nikkei. In 1989, it peaked at 40,000 yen. People thought that it could only go one way...up! The fact is that at the end of 1998, nine years later, the Nikkei index hit a low of 12,879. This is a decline of 67.80% over nine years, or on a compounded basis, it is a _11.82% return. Even in March of 1999, the Nikkei index is only selling at 15,591. This type of decline brings to mind a statement from Benjamin Graham, "the price you pay for an investment determines its return".